The use of risk profi les in the coordination of methods of placement and fastening of cargoes

Poorly executed processes for the development and coordination of methods for placing and securing cargoes lead to commercial malfunctions, uncoupling of cars en route, failures of technical means, and transport accidents. Therefore, the task of eliminating risks in the development and coordination of loading methods remains urgent. Today, the risk management system based on the data available in information systems is practically not used in these processes.

Currently, any person can develop ways to place and secure cargo without any restrictions. Due to the diff erent experience and knowledge of diff erent developers, the quality level of the loading schemes developed and submitted for approval diff ers signifi cantly. To categorize the developers of loading schemes in relation to the risks created, a methodology for determining the risk profi le of developers of methods for placing and securing cargoes is presented.

As the main indicators for assessing the risk profi le, it is proposed to use the number of returns of loading schemes when approving for revision and the nature of such returns. The technology of calculating the integral indicator of the quality of developing a method for placing and securing cargo is determined. Calculated values of risk profi les and indicators determining the quality of coordination of methods of cargo placement and fastening are formalized. A mechanism for risk categorization of loading scheme developers is proposed for eff ective and targeted measures to minimize risks from poor-quality methods of cargo placement and fastening.

1. Abdullaev M.Sh., Magomedov M.K. Investor risk profi ling. Innovative economy: information, analysis, forecasts. 2023;(3):110-114. DOI: 10.47576/2411-9520_2023_3_110. EDN MHRDQP. (In Russ.).

2. Gorelik V.A., Zolotova T.V. Method of assessing an investor’s risk profi le. Managing the development of large-scale systems (MLSD’2023). Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference. 2023; 700-705. DOI: 10.25728/mlsd.2023.0700. EDN PNHOFW. (In Russ.).

3. Harman R., Prus M. Computing optimal experimental designs with respect to a compound Bayes risk criterion. Statistics & Probability Letters. 2018 Feb 9;137:135-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2018.01.017.

4. Zakamouline V., Koekebakker S. A generalization of the mean-variance analysis. European Financial Management. 2009 Nov;15(5):934-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2009.00483.x.

5. Zenchenko S.V., Berezhnoy V.I. The system of integrated assessment of the fi nancial potential of the region and the methodology of its formation. Regional problems of economic transformation. 2010;15(2):22-30. (In Russ.).

6. Peshkova E.P., Kurdjiev S.P., Mambetova A.A. Methodological approach to the formation and assessment of the level of competitiveness of economic entities. Bulletin of the Rostov State University of Economics (RINH). 2015;50(2):117-25. EDN VAURAV. (In Russ.).

7. Aksenov I.A. Risk management system for customs control of goods and vehicles: a textbook. Vladimir. Publishing house Vladimir State University, 2021. 339 p. URL: https://dspace.www1.vlsu. ru/bitstream/123456789/9227/1/02245.pdf (In Russ.).

8. Modenov A.K., Vlasov M.P., Boboshko A.A. Formation and application of the risk profi le in the identifi cation of goods. St. Petersburg Economic Journal. 2019;(1):7-17. DOI: 10.25631/PEJ.2019.1.7.14. EDN ZDPHMT. (In Russ.).

9. Nikolaev A.S. Improving the practical activities of customs authorities in the risk management system. Almanac of scientifi c works of young scientists of ITMO University: Proceedings of the XLVI scientifi c and educational-methodical conference, St. Petersburg, January 31 – February 02, 2017. Volume 6. St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 2017;217-219. EDN XWGEOT. (In Russ.).

10. Shevchenko I.N., Boyarinova I.V. Risk profi les in the risk management system in customs authorities. Student Bulletin. 2020;118(20-5):92-94. EDN UDJREM. (In Russ.).

11. Starovoitov V.G. Introduction of a risk management system in federal authorities (on the example of the Federal customs service). Concept of the federal risk management system in the fi eld of economic security: Collection of materials of the All-Russian symposium “Problems of strategic management”, Moscow, February 20, 2018. Moscow. Kogito-Center Publishing House. 2018;82- 89. EDN OTRQMV. (In Russ.).

12. Gordienko A.A. On the reliability of methods of placing and securing goods during transportation by rail. Transport: science, technology, management. Scientifi c information collection. 2023;(9):9-16. DOI: 10.36535/0236-1914-2023-09-2. EDN SHTADS. (In Russ.).

13. Gordienko A.A. On uncoupling wagons with commercial malfunctions in railway transport. Transport: science, technology, management. Scientifi c information collection. 2023;(5):3-8. DOI: 10.36535/0236-1914-2023-05-1. EDN DTXKZX. (In Russ.).

14. Klyushnikova E.V., Shitova E.M. Methodological approaches to calculating the integral indicator, methods. Electronic scientifi c and practical journal “Innocenter”. 2016;10(1):4-18. (In Russ.).

15. Kurdjiev S.P., Mambetova A.A., Peshkova E.P. Integral assessment of the fi nancial condition of enterprises in the region. The economy of the region. 2016;12(2):586-601. DOI: 10.17059/2016–2–22. EDN VZEKCH. (In Russ.).