Natural and natural-anthropogenic measures for adapting transport infrastructure to climate change

   The purpose of the study is to analyze and develop natural and natural-anthropogenic measures for adapting transport infrastructure to climate change.

   The analysis was based on national and international regulations, best practices in the development and implementation of technical, organizational, natural and natural-anthropogenic measures for adapting transport infrastructure facilities to a changing climate. Although technical adaptation measures can be seen as the basis for ensuring safety against climate risks, the adoption of complementary or alternative nature-based measures will allow effective adaptation to be achieved more cost-effectively based on sustainable and long-term solutions. In some cases, technical adaptation measures are clearly determined, which largely deprives decision makers of flexibility when choosing a set of measures for a specific territory. Thus, hybrid solutions combining natural and technical measures can provide an optimal level of safety, taking into account the environmental impact, the area required to accommodate adaptation means, and the magnitude of costs.
Current engineering adaptation measures used at transport infrastructure facilities have been identified. With the exception of a number of procedural changes to current practice, most current measures are technical solutions. It has been established that complementing technical and organizational measures with natural and natural-human adaptation measures has the potential not only to provide ecosystem services that could increase biodiversity and ecological connectivity, but also to ensure the resilience of transport infrastructure to climate change. The widespread use of these adaptation measures will make it possible to position railway transport as a reliable, sustainable and environmentally friendly mode of transport.

1. Thornes J.E. The impact of weather and climate on transport in the UK. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. 1992;16(2):187-208. DOI: 10.1177/030913339201600202

2. Jaroszweski D., Chapman L., Petts J. Assessing the potential impact of climate change on transportation: the need for an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(2):331-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.07.005

3. Blackwood L., Renaud F.G., Gillespie S. Nature-based solutions as climate change adaptation measures for rail infrastructure. Nature-Based Solutions. 2022;2:100013. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100013

4. Lindgren J., Jonsson D.K., Carlsson-Kanyama A. Climate Adaptation of Railways: Lessons from Sweden. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2009. DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2009.9.2.3295

5. Debele S.E., Kumar P., Sahani J., Marti-Cardona B., Mickovski S.B. et al. Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classifi cation schemes and databases. Environmental Research. 2019;179:108799. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799

6. Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pirani A., Connors S.L. et al. Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2021.

7. Field C.B., Barros V., Stocker T.F., Dahe Q. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139177245

8. Nolte R., Kamburow C., Rupp J. Adaptation of Railway Infrastructure to Climate Change Final Report. Berlin, 2011.

9. Marteaux O. Tomorrow’s Railway and Climate Change Adaptation: Executive Report. Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited, London, 2016.

10. Palko K., Lemmen D.S. Climate risks and adaptation practices for the Canadian transportation sector 2016. Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management, 2017. DOI: 10.4095/314845

11. Mentink H., Hockridge B., Frandsen M. NEWP32 Transport green corridors : literature review, options appraisal and opportunity mapping. Natural England Commissioned Report NECR168. 2014.

12. Field C.B., Barros V.R., Dokken D.J., Mach K.J., Mastrandrea M.D. Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge, 2014. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107415379

13. Seddon N., Daniels E., Davis R., Chausson A., Harris R. et al. Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change. Global Sustainability. 2020;3. DOI: 10.1017/sus.2020.8

14. Cohen-Shacham E., Walters G., Janzen C., Maginnis S. Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2016. DOI: 10.2305/iucn.ch.2016.13.en

15. Kabisch N., Korn H., Stadler J., Bonn A. Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas — Linkages Between Science, Policy and Practice. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_1

16. Oliver J., Probst K., Renner I., Riha K. Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. 2024.

17. Renaud F.G., Nehren U., Sudmeier-Rieux K., Estrella M. Developments and Opportunities for Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation. Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in Practice. 2016;1-20. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_1

18. Jones H.P., Hole D.G., Zavaleta E.S. Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2(7):504-509. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1463