Options localization of the contrailer terminal

The subject of the study is the study of technically possible localization options for the contrailer terminal. The relevance is related to the practical need to improve the organization of the station through its track and territorial development.
Used analytical, design methods, evolutionary and functional approach.
Using the evolutionary-functional approach, alternative, technically possible options for improving the operation of the station were identified, taking into account the location of the contrailer terminal as part of the transport hub.
The possible options for the station’s development were critically evaluated. It was found that option 1 is located close to the station and requires minimal time to perform shunting operations. The advantages of option 2: the proximity of a year-round working seaport; a large free area for construction and no intersection with the main tracks of the station. It is noted that the final decision is possible only after the economic assessment of the options.

1. Malikov O.B. Warehouses and cargo terminals. St. Petersburg, Business-press, 2005;648. (In Russ.).

2. Malikov O.B. Container terminals: device, equipment, design, research. Saarbrücken, Germany, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014;257. (In Russ.).

3. Ermolaev K.N. et al. Economy of Russia: past, present, future: collective monograph / ed. by N.A. Adamova. Moscow, Institute for Research on Goods Movement and Wholesale Market Conditions, 2014;286. (In Russ.).

4. Pokrovskaya O.D. Organization of international delivery of goods through a distribution center: a tutorial. Novosibirsk, Center for the Development of Scientific Cooperation, 2015;102. (In Russ.).

5. Pokrovskaya O.D., Malykov O.B. Evolutionary functional approach to transport nodes classification. Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. 2017;14(3):406-419. (In Russ.).

6. Malykov O.B., Pokrovskaya O.D. Rate-setting system analysis of railroad transport from a position of logistics and customer-oriented approach. Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. 2017;14(2):187-199. (In Russ.).

7. Pokrovskaya O.D. Evolutionary-functional approach to the development of transport hubs. Political transport systems: materials of the IX International Scientific and Technical Conference. 2017;233-238. (In Russ.).

8. Samuylov V.M., Pokrovskaya O.D., Qiao Cong. Concept “New Silk Road” (China, Russia, Germany). Innotrans. 2017;4(26):26-28. DOI: 10.20291/2311-164X-2017-4-26-28 (In Russ.).

9. Pokrovskaya O.D. Organization of the work of the warehouse distribution system: a tutorial. Novosibirsk, Center for the Development of Scientific Cooperation, 2015;66. (In Russ.).

10. Pokrovskaya O.D., Titova T.S. Research vocabulary of terminalistics. Bulletin of Scientific Research Result. 2018;2:29-43. (In Russ.).

11. Pokrovskaya O.D., Malikov O.B. Concerning the logistics hierarchy of railway facilities. Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. 2016;4(49):521-531. (In Russ.).

12. Svatovskaya L.B., Shershneva M.V., Baidarashvili M.M., Sychova A.M., Titova T.S., Yakimova N.I. et al. Foam concrete construction demolished waste. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Waste Management and Recycling: Construction Demolition Waste: International Conference on Sustainable Waste Management and Recycling. sponsors: Kingston University, Concrete and Masonry Research Group, UK / ed. M.C. Limbachiya, J.J. Roberts, Kingston University, School of Engineering, United Kingdom. London, 2004;199-203. (In Russ.).

13. Titova T.S., Stepanova A.A. Environmental problems of transport construction. Technosphere and environmental safety in transport (TEBTRANS-2014): abstracts of the IV International scientific and practical conference. Petersburg State Transport University of Emperor Alexander I. 2014;80-81. (In Russ.).

14. Agunov A.V., Titova T.S., Kruchek V.A.On the construction of power quality control systems. Electrical Engineering. 2016;5:14-19. (In Russ.).