Analysis of the feasibility of overhaul and modernization of tram cars

The current situation on the territory of Russian transport parks is considered, where the preference is given to the modernization of the existing rolling stock over the purchase of new transport. The analysis of modernization is carried out, the main stages and advantages of the improvement of tram cars are shown on the example of tram facilities in St. Petersburg and Izhevsk. A number of trends that have developed in modern market conditions are noted. The use of one of the oldest modes of transport — the tram — has proven its profitability, high carrying capacity, the ability to achieve high speeds, and the introduction of the latest technologies to reduce noise and vibration increases not only aesthetic appeal for urban residents, but also reduces the impact on environmental systems.

It has been established that overhaul and refurbishment with complete modernization can extend the service life of the tram up to 15 years.

"Launching" a tram line on a concession basis in a small town can become an effective anti-crisis tool with an appropriate feasibility study and organizational issues. The tram as a public transport is more profitable for the city, since the lane allocated for it is more efficiently used, because a tram in a 2-3-car coupling carries more people than a trolleybus. Renewal of the tram fleet through modernization is a current trend.

1. Dudkin E.P, Chernyaeva V.A., Doronicheva S.A., Smirnov K.A. Increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of the tram in the passenger transportation market. Bulletin of the Petersburg University of Railways. 2017;2:230-237. (In Russ.).

2. Polikarpov A.A., Skok I.A. Railway engineering of Russia: results of 2019 and prospects for 2020. Technics of Railways. 2020;1(49):37-43. (In Russ.).

3. Golyashev A., Lobanova A., Buryak E., Kulpina V. Population activity in the use of transport services. Bulletin of the socio-economic crisis in Russia. 2015;07:10-14. URL: https://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/7059.pdf (In Russ.).

4. Nikitina O., Skorlygina N., Usov I. Trillions are packed into buses. Renovation of urban transport in the regions will be long and expensive. Kommersant. 07.30.2020;134:5. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4434575 (In Russ.).

5. Ivanov S.V., Bogatu D.P, Michurov R.L., Matveev A.A. PC TS tram's evolution as an example of the influence of long-term order on the technical development of rolling stock. Technics of Railways. 2020;2(50):45-49. (In Russ.).

6. Savchuk V., Polikarpov A., Skok I. State of the tram system in Russia. Tekhnika zheleznykh dorog. 2015;1(29)February. URL: http://www.ipem.ru/news/publications/914.html (In Russ.).

7. Bakharev K., Grishchenko N., Kazantseva T., Sukharev M., Shepeleva A., Yurkova A., Ledyaeva M. The last trolleybus. Russian newspaper. 11.27.2019. URL: https://rg.ru/2019/11/27/reg-szfo/pochemu-v-nekotoryh-gorodah-ischezaiut-troNejbusy-i-tramvai.html (In Russ.).

8. Savchuk V. Reviving the tram — are the manufacturers ready, but the state? Russian business newspaper. 09.12.2014. URL: http://www.ipem.ru/news/publications/883.html (In Russ.).

9. Matveeva E.V. Felix Vinokur: "We will aggressively go to growing markets”. Technics of Railways. 2018;4(44):4-7. (In Russ.).

10. Titova T.S., Akhtyamov R.G., Elizariev A.N., Efremenko V.V., Chuyenko A.S. Hazard analysis and development of railway transport safety device. Safety of Life. 2020;4(232):20-24. (In Russ.).

11. Titova T.S., Stepanova A.A. Environmental problems of transport construction. Technosphere and environmental safety in transport (TEBTRANS-2014): abstracts of the IV International scientific and practical conference. 2014;80-81. (In Russ.).

12. Titova T.S., Kopytenkova O.I., Kurepin D.Ye. On an objective assessment of acoustic impact. Railway Transport. 2017;5:75-77. (In Russ.).

13. Titova T.S. Methodology for a comprehensive assessment of environmental friendliness and quality of environmental technologies. Index IEQ. Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. 2005;2(4):98-105. (In Russ.).

14. Saakyan Y., Skok I. Tram Market In 2020: The situation in Russia and foreign experience. Technics of Railways. 2020;2(50):17-23. (In Russ.).

15. Azanov R. "Time Machine”: how and why trams are being modernized in Russia. TASS. 07.19.2018. URL: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/5381599 (In Russ.).

16. Gultyaev A. Modernization of the LM-68M tram and the creation of a new model 71-301. Technics of railways. 2016;4(36):50-55. URL: http://www.ipem.ru/files/files/tzd_web_versions/tzd_36_web_full.pdf (In Russ.).

17. Valdin V. Tram "Concession”, or how to organize the modernization of transport. Transport in Russia. 11.06.2020. URL: https://tr.ru/articles/3744-tramvay-koncessiya-ili-kak-naladit-mod-ernizaciyu-transporta (In Russ.).

18. Ivanov S.V. New domestic low-floor trams. Technics of Railways. 2015;1(29):64-67. (In Russ.).

19. Pokrovskaya O.D., Korovyakovsky E.K. Terminalistics — organization and management in transport hubs. Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. 2016;13(4):(49):509-520. (In Russ.).

20. Pokrovskaya O.D. Comprehensive assessment of transport and storage systems of railway transport: dis. doctors of technical sciences. St. Petersburg, Petersburg State Transport University of Emperor Alexander I, 2018;377. (In Russ.).

21. Kyrenkov P.V., Preobrazhenskii D.A., Astafyev A.V., Safronova A.A., Kahrimanova D.G. Synchromodal and co-modal transportations, a-modal booking and trimodal terminals as perspective directions of development of transport logistics. Railway Transport. 2019;3:30-35. (In Russ.).

22. Golomolzin V.G., Pokrovskaya O.D. Characteristics and role of the terminal network of the transport hub in the organization of container trains. Railway Transport. 2021;2:16-21. (In Russ.).